In
1998, over 40 percent of all women living with AIDS had been infected
through injecting drug use.(1)
By expanding drug treatment and needle exchange programs, the
United States could substantially reduce new HIV infections among women
and men who inject drugs. Drug
treatment helps prevent the spread of HIV because people who inject
drugs, once in treatment, reduce their drug use and consequently their
risk of sharing infected needles. Once
in treatment, they also less likely to get involved in risky sex,
another way to contract HIV. A
nationally representative survey of 1,800 people in drug treatment,
recently published by the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services,
confirms that treatment helps drug users improve their lives. Comparing the lives of patients 5 years before treatment and
5 years afterward, the study found:(2)
Of
the 23 million Americans who used illicit drugs sometime in 1996, the
Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) estimates that roughly a
fifth were in need of drug treatment. Of those thought to be in need of
treatment, less than half were actually receiving it.(3)
The
distinction ONDCP makes between drug use and drug dependence (in need of
treatment) is a useful one. Once
we are able recognize that some people who use drugs are in greater need
of treatment than others, we can begin to discuss who should have
priority in treatment Because
very serious diseases (AIDS and hepatitis B and C) are spread through
injecting drug use, it would be reasonable for injecting drug users to
be given priority in treatment. Yet
when we turn to the drug most commonly injected - heroin - and its
treatment of choice - methadone - we find that access to treatment is
very limited.(4)
Only about 154,000 of the estimated 810,000 opiate-dependent
persons in the United States are in methadone maintenance therapy.(5)
Some
people have opposed methadone maintenance because it involves the use of
another opiate, methadone. However
methadone does not give a high; it can be legally prescribed; and it is
effective. The National
Institute of Health Consensus Statement on opiate addiction puts it this
way: Although
a drug-free state represents an optimal treatment goal, research has
demonstrated that this goal cannot be achieved or sustained by the
majority of opiate-dependent people.
However, other laudable treatment goals, including decreased
illicit drug use, reduced criminal activity, and the attainment of
gainful employment can be achieved by most methadone maintenance
patients.(6), (7) Methadone
is the only drug treatment option for the opiate-dependent pregnant
woman. Methadone combined
with sound prenatal care has been shown to decrease obstetrical and
fetal complications.(8)
If an opiate-dependent expectant mother undergoes opiate
detoxification, her fetus may be harmed or even killed. Methadone
treatment is appropriate only for people dependent on heroin or other
opiates.(9)
For individuals who inject cocaine or amphetamines (or other
non-opiate drugs), custom treatment strategies or therapeutic
communities are appropriate approaches.
The
federal government spends 20 percent of the nation's $17 billion
drug-control budget to treat drug dependent individuals.(10)
Barry R. McCaffrey, Director of the Office of National Drug
Control Policy, and experts outside government as well, say it would be
both cost effective and humane to increase the government's expenditures
on drug treatment.(11)
Methadone
maintenance treatment for heroin addiction costs $3,900 a year; prison
about $25,900 a year.(12) Given
the severity of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, the tremendous unmet need for
more drug treatment, and the effectiveness of the treatment approaches
we now have, the United States should implement the following: Make
methadone maintenance available to all who are dependent on opiates and
who wish treatment, including especially pregnant women.(13)
Currently,
methadone maintenance therapy is available only to about 1 in 5 heroin
users in the United States.
We
need to expand substantially the availability of drug treatment for
people who inject drugs, both for their own sakes and for the benefits
that will come to society from having them out of the drug dependent
world. But we also need to
be realistic about what to expect from drug treatment as HIV prevention. Not all people who inject drugs are interested in having drug
treatment. Drug dependence
is a chronic, relapsing disease; this means we must anticipate that some
who have gotten treatment will, in fact, relapse.(15)
All these considerations lead to a significant conclusion:
expanding drug treatment alone cannot stop the spread of HIV
among persons who inject drugs. Needle exchange programs are also needed.
Footnotes (1)
Table 25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) HIV/AIDS
Surveillance Report. U.S.
HIV and AIDS cases reported through June 1999. Midyear Edition. (2)
Page 1. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration. Services Research Outcomes
Study.
Rockville, MD. September 1998. (3)
The Office of National Drug Control Policy estimates that there were
between 4.4 and 5.3 million people in need of drug treatment in 1996.
In 1999, when the ONDCP report was written, less than 2 million
people receiving drug treatment. Page 59. Office of National Drug
Control Policy.
National Drug Control Strategy 1999.
Washington, D.C. The estimate of the number of
the number of persons using illicit drugs in 1996 is taken from
page 17, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration, National Household Survey on Drug
Abuse: Population Estimates 1996. (4)
New federal rules for methadone maintenance have been proposed that are
intended to increase accessibility, quality and oversight of methadone
treatment. U.S. Dept. of
Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration. "New Federal Rules Proposed to Improve Quality and
Oversight of Methadone Treatment." Press release. July 22, 1999. (5)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. "New
Federal Rules Proposed to Improve Quality and Oversight of Methadone
Treatment," Press Release dated July 22, 1999.
In 1997, it was estimated that only 115,000 of an estimated
600,000 opiate-dependent persons in the United States were in methadone
maintenance therapy. See page 4. Effective
Medical Treatment of Opiate Addiction. National Institute of Health
Consensus Statement 1997. November
17-19. Volume 15. No.6. 38 pages. (6)
Page 5. Effective Medical Treatment of Opiate
Addiction. National
Institute of Health Consensus Statement. 1997.
November 17-19. Volume
15. No.6. 38 pages.
(8)
Page 13. Effective
Medical Treatment of Opiate Addiction. National
Institute of Health Consensus Statement 1997.
November 17-19. Volume
15. No.6. 38 pages. (9)
People who inject a mixture of heroin and cocaine can also be
appropriately treated with methadone. (10)
Lauran Neergaard. "Study: Treatment Best for Addicts."
Associated Press. March 18, 1999. (11)
Christopher S. Wren. "Top U.S. Drug Official Proposes Shift in
Criminal Justice Policy," New York Times, December 9, 1999, p. A23.
and George D. Lundberg, "New Winds Blowing for American Drug
Policies." Journal of the American Medical Association. September
17, 1999. page 946-7. (12)
David C. Lewis and June E. Osborn, "A Waste of Lives and
Money," Washington Post. July 20, 1998, page A17. (13)
In 1993, ten states still had no methadone treatment. Page S226, Ernest
Drucker, Peter Lurie, Alex Wodak and Philip Alcabes. 1998.
“Measuring harm reduction: the effects of needle exchange and syringe
exchange programs and methadone maintenance on the ecology of HIV.” AIDS.
Vol. 12
(Supplement A), page S217-S230. (14)
Page 60. Office of National
Drug Control Policy. National Drug Control Strategy 1999.
Washington, D.C. (15) Page 59. Office of National Drug Control Policy. National Drug Control Strategy 1999. Washington, D.C. For a list
of other materials used on this website, see References. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||